Search Switch

How countries are handling Airbnb’s disruption

  • Published: 11 Jul 2018 at 10:55 4 comments
  • WRITER: Aaron Aerni Kuvanun

The logo of Airbnb is displayed at an Airbnb event in Tokyo on June 14. (Reuters photo)

- +

Related Stories

With 35 million international arrivals to Bangkok in 2017, it has become a major challenge for the Thai government to regulate Airbnb.

Many Airbnb listings compete against hotel industry offerings, yet hosts that operate through Airbnb do not pay taxes nor do they have the necessary safety standards that are required from hotels and serviced apartments.

The core of Airbnb’s problem in Thailand, a technology company created only less than 10 years ago, is that there are currently no laws that specifically address Airbnb’s disruptive business model innovation.

However, two Airbnb hosts were each fined 5,000 baht by the Hua Hin Provincial Court this year over their roles in providing unauthorised short-term stays, each with varying daily fines for the duration of the offence.

Different countries are taking different approaches in dealing with Airbnb’s disruption. 

In Singapore, all short-term rental of private and public housing posted on Airbnb is strictly prohibited, the permitted length of lease is a minimum of three months and six months, respectively. The Singaporean government’s intention is clearly to protect the hotel industry. 

Japan is attempting to gradually legitimise Airbnb by recently implementing the Minpaku “Home-Sharing” Law, which has been in effect since June 15.

Eighty percent of Japan’s Airbnb listings had been removed prior to the new law’s implementation. This law states that all Airbnb hosts are required to register for authorities to inspect their premises and issue official fire and safety permits. Properties can only be rented out through Airbnb for no more than 180 days per year and failure to comply with the law can result in fines of up to 1 million yen (300,000 baht).

France often prohibits Airbnb in crowded urban areas because of concerns related to inadequate housing supply. Hosts are not permitted to rent out primary residences for a period of more than 120 days per year unless a special permit is obtained.

In cases where a landlord authorises a tenant to sublet through Airbnb, the tenant’s monthly revenue from subletting must not surpass the monthly rent paid to the landlord.

Italy addressed Airbnb’s situation by giving landlords an option to apply a flat 21% tax on short-term rental income instead of the traditional personal income tax bracket that ranges from 23% to 43%. It is Airbnb’s duty to transfer the 21% tax on gross rent to the Italian Revenue Agency and transfer the remainder to the landlord. 

In Thailand, there are two ambiguous laws related to Airbnb’s case. The 2004 Hotel Act prohibits landlords of properties from providing short-term rentals for a period of less than 30 days without a hotel licence. The 2008 Ministerial Regulation, which governs hotel operations, contains clauses that would exclude short-term rental properties, specifically guesthouses or properties with four rooms or less and/or can accommodate no more than 20 guests, from being considered as a hotel.

To some extent, renting out private houses on Airbnb is comparable to operating a guest house because these properties operate in a small scale, whereby single guests/groups are easily monitored.

However, problems tend to happen when condominium owners start renting out their units through Airbnb. Condominium buildings have many different owners, some of whom are owner-occupiers and others who rent out properties to medium- to long-term tenants, who make these condos their home. These tenants would not approve of any disturbance and potential safety issue often caused by short-term transient guests who rent rooms on a daily or weekly basis.

This explains why many condominium juristic entities are putting up notices prohibiting Airbnb in their buildings and often refer to the 2004 Hotel Act. It remains to be seen what the standardised penalty will be and how severely it will be enforced on lawbreakers compared to other Asian countries.

Aaron Aerni Kuvanun is senior analyst at Research and Consulting, CBRE Thailand. He can be reached at Facebook: CBRE.Thailand LinkedIn: CBRE Thailand LINE@: CBRE Thailand Twitter: @CBREThailand and website:


Sathaporn readies four new projects

Sathaporn readies four new projects

Sathaporn Estate Co, a new company under developer Chalermnakhon Co, plans to launch four residential projects worth 6.8 billion baht in the next 18 months, with a focus on the upper-en...

Singha Estate keen on Fiji, Maldives addition

Singha Estate keen on Fiji, Maldives addition

SET-listed property firm Singha Estate Plc (S) wants to expand its hotel rooms and develop super-luxury villas for sale in Fiji after taking over two resorts there from American hotel c...

4 people commented about the above

Readers are urged not to submit comments that may cause legal dispute including slanderous, vulgar or violent language, incorrectly spelt names, discuss moderation action, quotes with no source or anything deemed critical of the monarchy. More information in our terms of use.

Please use our forum for more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another.